Site icon Just Money

Current Scholarship
Why the Fed and ECB Parted Ways on Climate Change: The Politics of Divergence in the Global Central Banking Community

Authors : Monica DiLeo, Glenn D Rudebusch, and Jens van ’t Klooster

Central banks form a global policy community with a historically high degree of convergence around the norms of central bank independence. However, in recent years, climate change has emerged as a topic of clear-cut divergence – most strikingly between the historically similar European Central Bank (ECB) and US Federal Reserve (Fed). We develop a theoretical framework that allows us to explore not only factors pushing towards central bank convergence, but also divergence. We show that in an initial stage of emergence, a largely autonomous process of internal deliberation led the ECB to endorse new climate-related norms, where this dynamic was absent in the United States. In a second phase of cascade, marked by the founding of the Network for Greening the Financial System and a growing body of research on climate impacts and central bank objectives, climate-related norms began to exert limited pressure towards convergence. However, the Fed’s perceptions of political risk constrained its adoption of climate-related policies, and eventually led to a retreat from climate following the re-election of President Donald Trump at the end of 2024.
DiLeo, M., Rudebusch, G. D., & van ’t Klooster, J. (2026). Why the Fed and ECB parted ways on climate change: The politics of divergence in the global central banking community. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, available here
Keep an eye on Just Money!

Receive email notifications when new posts are added to Current Scholarship.

We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing to Current Scholarship!
Exit mobile version