Luke Herrine, University of Alabama School of Law
The central legal focus of the Article is the prohibition on “unfair acts or practices” shared by many federal and state agencies with consumer protection jurisdiction. The descriptive and normative arguments of this Article explain why it is now at the center of the action—and why that should be welcomed.
More “Current Scholarship
Consumer Protection after Consumer Sovereignty”
Nathan Tankus & Luke Herrine
This chapter provides an alternative basis for the economic analysis of competition law from conventional neoclassical theory.
More “Current Scholarship
Competition Law as Collective Bargaining Law”
Luke Herrine
This article argues for a fundamental rethinking of the function of consumer protection. It is time to abandon welfare economics and adopt what this article refers to as “moral economy”.
More “Current Scholarship
Consumer Protection after Consumer Sovereignty”